The InterAsia Partnership

The ACSS has been serving for more than a decade as a core partner in an international, inter-institutional consortium of InterAsia Partners that developed InterAsia as a concept, paradigm, and empirical framework, re-envisioning the Asian expanse as an interconnected geographical formation that transcends conventional academic and geopolitical labels and divisions. InterAsia seeks to promote frameworks and concepts for a new generation of scholarship that re-conceptualizes Asia as a dynamic and interconnected formation spanning Central Asia, East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East (including Turkey), and Russia.

The InterAsia Consortium

Mission

The InterAsia Partnership connects and networks scholars, practitioners, universities and knowledge institutions in order to re-envision and reconfigure Asia as an interconnected formation. The Partnership develops transregional frames that transcend conventional academic and geopolitical labels, promotes better understandings of historical and contemporary phenomena and processes in complex global settings and enables collaborative and comparative projects and practices.

Why InterAsia?

InterAsia as a concept, paradigm and empirical framework, works to re-envision the vast Asian expanse as an interconnected geographical formation that transcends conventional academic and geopolitical labels and divisions into East, West, Central, Eurasia, Northeast, South and Southeast. It seeks to highlight connections and continuities, as well as divergences and differences, while remaining grounded in robust knowledge of contexts and spaces that overlap, merge, converge and disconnect as outcomes of historical and contemporary processes and forces. These contexts and spaces also include complex infrastructures and landscapes that transcend universities and include formal and informal practices that produce knowledge and shape local, regional and global realities. The ambition of transregional and transdisciplinary knowledge production emphasizes the study of issues and geographies that do not fit neatly into existing divisions of academia or the world and encourages the production of scholarship that addresses world regions and peoples neglected or marginalized by the standard divisions of the world and long histories that have been ignored because they do not fit prevailing “regional optics” or civilizational chronologies. It recognizes terrains that are not spatially compact, such as trade routes, waterways, and communities of co-religionists, but that may have strong territorial characteristics. Finally, while decentering the unit of analysis from both “regions” and “nation-states”, it is attentive to ongoing processes of regionalization and re-regionalization as well as various ways in which the nation-state may be asserting itself locally and globally.