The Hanna Batatu Lecture Series

Held: 2015-2018

The Annual Lecture is one of the main public events organized by the Arab Council for the Social Sciences. It is an occasion where we welcome prominent social scientists in and of the Arab region to present on their work and foster debates on contemporary issues and challenges that the Arab world is facing today as well as on histories and legacies of the past. The first Series (2015-2018) commemorates Professor Hanna Batatu (1926-2000) and honors the scholarship and contributions of the late Palestinian political scientist and historian whose work on Iraq and Syria are widely considered as pre-eminent studies of modern Arab states and societies.

About Hanna Batatu

Hanna John Batatu (1926-2000) was an internationally renowned scholar and a highly regarded authority on the contemporary Arab world, specifically the histories of Iraq and Syria. Born in Jerusalem, Palestine, Hanna Batatu emigrated to the United States in 1948. The Nakba and the plight of Palestine and its people had a visceral impact on his life. From 1951 to 1953, he studied at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and earned a prestigious award for undergraduates. He won a scholarship to study political science at Harvard where he met and studied with Professors Barrington Moore Junior and Herbert Marcuse and was heavily influenced by their Marxist methodology. Like his mentor Marcuse, Batatu would later define and introduce himself to his students as an independent Marxist. From the 1950s till his passing in 2000, Professor Batatu dedicated his writing and career to studying, teaching and writing about the history of the modern Middle East. In his writings, Hanna Batatu set the highest standards for historians and researchers and effectively established a scholarly basis for the study, analysis and historical documentation of societal development in contemporary Iraq and Syria. His methodology is grounded in political sociology and considers in detail social factors in the development of state and society, with particular emphasis on the social composition of political movements. His work on Iraq has widely been considered the pre-eminent study of modern Iraqi history and one of the best works on the Middle East to be published in the second half of the 20th century. It paved the way for any study that followed concerning modern Iraq and its political and socio-economic history.

The Inaugural Lecture (Beirut 2015)

The first lecture in the Hanna Batatu Lecture Series is entitled “The 1908 Constitutional Revolution as a Critical Point in the History of the Levant (Bilad al-Sham): A Reading of the Problematics of Local History”, and was given by the Palestinian sociologist, Professor Salim Tamari. Dr. Salim Tamari is professor of sociology at Birzeit University and an adjunct professor at the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies at Georgetown University. His lecture addresses the Constitutional Revolution that overthrew the Ottoman Sultan Hamid’s tyranny and opened the door for a new socio-political system in the capitals of the Levant. He will present a new reading of the contributions by local historians, who had different positions concerning the Constitutional Revolution and the concept of Ottoman decentralization. The lecture particularly tackles the critical social changes that swept through the city of Nablus during the revolution and the counter-revolution (1909) through the works of the following local historians: Rafiq al-Tamimi and Mohamad Bahjat (ethnography of Beirut, Damascus, Aleppo, Jerusalem, and Balqa); Ihsan el-Nimir (defending the Sultanic Regime and Abdulhamid’s administration against the Young Turks) and Muhammad Izzat Darwaza (analyzing the Constitutional Revolution and the counter-revolution.) Dr. Salim Tamari’s reading builds on the legacy of Professor Hanna Batatu through analyzing the relationship between rural areas and the city, the relationship between peasants and the state, and the structural change in the composition of the local groups that dominated the central state.

The Second Lecture (Amman 2016)

Titled “Society and History in Iraq between Hanna Batatu and Ali al-Wardi”, the second lecture in the Hanna Batatu Lecture Series was given by Lebanese-American historian, Dina Rizk Khoury. Khoury is Professor of History and International Affairs at George Washington University and a Guggenheim Fellow. Khoury’s lecture focuses on the writings of Hanna Batatu and Ali al-Wardi and the implications of their distinct methodologies to our understanding of the history and politics and present-day Iraq. Drawing on Marxist class analysis, Hanna Batatu traced the development of Iraqi society from a pre-modern one based on tribal and communal loyalties, to a modern class society in which allegiances to class and to political parties co-existed and sometimes replaced older more traditional allegiances. By contrast Ali al-Wardi drew on the sociological thinking of Ibn Khaldun as well as on the work of American social psychologists. He understood the history of Iraq, not as a linear progression from pre-modern forms of social organization to modern ones, but as a continuous struggle between hadara and badawa, between the cultures of urban settled life and the primordial allegiances to tribe and sect. Looking at Batatu’s and al-Wardi’s histories of modern Iraq in 2016, one would tend to find much in al-Wardi that helps in our understanding of present day Iraq. Beginning in the 1990s, al-Wardi’s works have been republished and widely circulated. This revival of al-Wardi speaks to a wider questioning of the Arab world of the project of modernity and the post-colonial regimes that have ruled since the 1950s. Batatu’s class analysis and his relative optimism in the project of modernity appear incongruous with the present realities of Iraq. However, we give up a great deal of insight into the modern history of Iraq if we only see its social history through the lens of al-Wardi’s work.  Not the least of what we give up is the accomplishments, however problematic, of the modernization project in Iraq and the prospect of speaking of an Iraqi future outside the confines of sect and tribe.

The Third Lecture (Tunis 2017)

Titled “The History of the Iraqi Communist Party: Between the Academic Hanna Batatu and the Political Activist Aziz Sibahi”, the third lecture in the Hanna Batatu Lecture Series was given by the Iraqi historian, Thabit A.J. Abdullah. Thabit A.J. Abdullah was born and raised in Baghdad Iraq. He received his PhD in history in 1992 from Georgetown University in Washington, DC. He currently holds the position of Professor and Chair of the Department of History at York University in Toronto, Canada. Thabet’s lecture focused on the different approaches adopted by Batatu and Sbahi in writing the history of the Iraqi Communist Party. In 2002, after decades of delays and postponements, the Iraqi Communist Party finally published a work outlining and analysing its history. The threev olume work written by one of the Party’s long-serving cadres, Aziz Sbahi, appeared as a direct response to Hanna Batatu’s monumental work on Iraq. Batatu had long hoped that the Party would respond to his work by publishing their own version of how their history unfolded and was delighted to hear that Sbahi had started to work on it. Unfortunately, he would not live long enough to read or comment upon it. While both, Batatu and Sbahi, adopted a Marxist approach to writing the history of the Communist Party, their respective backgrounds left its mark on their work. Batatu was an academic of Palestinian origin. He was educated at Georgetown and Harvard in the United States and had an uncanny ability to place his subject within the broader social and economic framework of modern Iraq. Batatu tended to emphasize the objective conditions in which the Party developed and the general social background of its members. Sbahi, on the other hand, was an Iraqi from a poor family background. With very little formal education he was, on the whole, a self-educated man who joined the Communist Party in his youth and spent his entire life struggling within its ranks. His history is written from the perspective of one who lived the struggle from within and emphasizes the subjective conditions and individual decisions taken at specific instances. After looking at examples of the two authors’ differing approaches to the writing of the history of the Iraqi Communist Party, attention was turned to the present. The question, which was asked at the end of the presentation, was whether the two approaches may help us shed light on the current condition of the Party after the American invasion of 2003?